In that case you must be bothered by the judiciary committee's treatment of Amy Coney Barrett. They literally asked her two dozen times i she has her own brain or if she is just an extension of Scalia. But it's fine because we only care about women if it's the "right kind of woman"
Haha this is silly. Dont get butt hurt over my stance on masks. But to clarify— i wear a mask out of respect and because it cant hurt. But correlations between countries that did well and countries that wore masks dont bear out
the far left is definitely not pulling the democratic party. if that were true, we'd have universal healthcare, free or affordable public higher education, tons of public transit, and a sensible minimum wage by now
lol you don't know what a riot is if you think that's a riot. you're afraid of peaceful protests? what happened to people being proud of people exercising first amendment rights? people go off to war and justify it by citing our rights
barriers could be reasonable for certain stretches but they are not cost effective immigration enforcement. physical barriers mean little to nothing in most regions of the border and true immigration enforcement would have to be employer/incentive based
the answer is, Biden did DO something, he passed a popular crime bill, that turned out to be misguided, and admitted he was wrong....while Trump was saying the bill wasn't harsh enough on those in inner cities
house of representatives was designed to provide balance to the senate. each state gets 2 senators, and then each state gets members in the house in proportion to its size. in 1929 we capped the size of the house, and now both houses of congress disproportionately favor states with smaller populations