All threads

All of the threads for this selected topic

Final Class Feedback [12-01-20]

24 replies | 24 unread

Of what is this 'evidence'?

2 replies | 2 unread

Roman Catholic Diocese v. Cuomo

28 replies | 28 unread

Feedback [11-30-20]

44 replies | 44 unread

Thanksgiving Thread

19 replies | 19 unread

Peremptory Challenges [11-23-2020]

77 replies | 77 unread

Feedback [11-17-20]

57 replies | 57 unread

Your questions, doubts and concerns about confrontation and cross as core jury process.

22 replies | 22 unread

Feedback November 10

17 replies | 17 unread

Feedback [11-09-20]

24 replies | 24 unread

Discussion Group 2 [11-9-2020]

19 replies | 19 unread

Discussion Group 1 [11-9-2020]

28 replies | 28 unread

Election Night

25 replies | 25 unread

George Fisher Caves [11-03-2020]

29 replies | 29 unread

Group 1 [11-03-2020]

53 replies | 53 unread

Group 2 [11-03-2020]

49 replies | 49 unread

Group 3 [11-03-2020]

35 replies | 35 unread

Feedback 11-2-2020

34 replies | 34 unread

Feedback 10-27-2020

47 replies | 47 unread

Discussion 10-27-2020

59 replies | 59 unread

Feedback 10-26-2020

51 replies | 51 unread

Hypothetical 10-19-20

49 replies | 49 unread

Feedback 10-20-2020

15 replies | 15 unread

Feedback 10-19-20

22 replies | 22 unread

Surveillance 10-19-20

46 replies | 46 unread

Feedback October 13, 2020

20 replies | 20 unread


31 replies | 31 unread

REVIEW - October 13, 2020. Please offer questions and concerns.

3 replies | 3 unread

Feedback Oct 6, 2020 - violence of discussion for some

7 replies | 7 unread

Feedback October 6, 2020

67 replies | 67 unread

Feedback Oct 5, 2020 Fair

4 replies | 4 unread

Gatecrasher - Who Wins?

15 replies | 15 unread

Blue Bus

25 replies | 25 unread

Conjunction --In what order should we decide the elements of the alleged crime?

21 replies | 21 unread

Prison Yard - Can WE prosecute all of them?

38 replies | 38 unread

Feedback [09-29-20]

17 replies | 17 unread

Would you be interested in joining together in threads while watching the Trump-Biden debate?

20 replies | 20 unread

feedback sept 28

26 replies | 26 unread

What is your biggest fear going forward?

40 replies | 40 unread

BIAS (in judgmen)t

9 replies

Feedback #1

30 replies | 30 unread

racism - anti-racism

41 replies | 41 unread

what is your passion?

40 replies | 40 unread

What do you feel you have to learn about fair trial? Do you feel that fair trial matters?

9 replies | 9 unread

Give Thanks

0 replies

Active thread

Only the replies to the one thread you selected
Druigh: A bias is a preconceived notion that interferes with a person's ability to objectively assess a person, object, or situation.
Est Haemlet: Bias is an underlying belief or preconception, either conscious or unconscious, about a specific trait or attribute that renders a person unable to think/perceive clearly.
Bespin: Bias is when subjective, anecdotal or otherwise non-objective factors interfere with our ability to make dispassionate logical and/or rational conclusions about reality in a way that often conforms with whatever schemas or heuristics we have already come to rely upon to survive more easily.
Venus: The above definitions of bias get at the heart of the issue better than I could ever articulate. Much of the focus appears to be on the failure to act/think rationally, which is absolutely true but I just want to draw attention to the fact that bias not only exists as a "negative" force, in that it causes people to think that some groups can't do something, but also a "positive" force in that it causes people with biases to give the benefit of the doubt to particular groups which removes opportunities for others
Whirlpool: There is no such thing as totally "objective" factors. Every measured factor is a factor that we have made a normative decision to measure. Bias is a belief or reason for something that is drawn from the "wrong" normative values as opposed to the "right" normative values.
Callisto: Bias is pervasive. Our mind isn't able to always (or even often) assess the exact truth about a particular fact, person, etc., and so we've evolved to take mental shortcuts. Not all biases are bad, and in fact many are good - e.g. we prepare to fight/flee if we see a tiger (even if they don't attack 95% of the time, it's critical to be prepared for the 5% that they do). As individuals, we have to (1) become comfortable with the fact that biases are an innate part of us if we are to talk about them honestly, and (2) realize that negative biases become much more harmful when they invade/pervade systems and institutions, such as our criminal justice process. Thus, everyone may have biases, but not all biases are equal in their effect.
Sirius A: I'll echo the definitions above, and emphasize how a) there are thousands of types of bias and b) it's impossible for anyone to be completely "unbiased." Therefore, diversity on a jury (ie, the widest range of competing biases possible) is critical...
Felucia: I echo the above. The law and the processes through which it is enforced are also biased. Therefore, when biased jurors confront that systemic bias, they can either cause additional harm or act as a counterweight, depending on all parties involved.
Alderaan: I agree with "Betelgeuse" above and will add: and impacts what actions are or are not taken in relation to another with one of the traits or attributes for which they have a bias towards